It can be secret. Question is, why?

Print Article

There might be something citizens can learn from open elections of officers.

MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, when officers are elected to local government boards and councils, it's a breezy united front with leadership positions being filled without dissent.

So when we noticed the Beloit City Council had a tight 4-3 decision that made Clinton Anderson rather than Beth Jacobson vice president of the body, it ignited some curiosity.

We wanted to know specifically how the seven members of the council voted. The answer, basically, is the councilors cast secret paper ballots which were then tallied, the results announced, without any public record of who voted for whom.

THAT DIDN'T SOUND right in a state that values transparency, so we checked. Surprisingly, state law makes room for electing officers to public bodies without a public right to access. The law states there is an exception and the selection of governmental body officers may be done by secret ballot.

So.

Let us make a counter-argument.

Just because state law allows secrecy doesn't mean state law requires secrecy. That is a decision boards and councils make on their own. In our view secrecy is the wrong choice. Elected representatives, in the absence of any overriding necessity, always should opt for transparency as the default position.

ONE MIGHT ASK, legitimately, who really cares?

Let's pose just one potential reason. If a given candidate faces stiff opposition, citizens or the press might reasonably want to know why. If a given individual is possibly not well regarded by colleagues on an elected body, one of the key ways to detect internal frictions might be the outcome of leadership votes.

So, respectfully, and acknowledging the law allows these bodies to maintain secrecy, we request local elected bodies choose transparency instead.

People can handle the truth. Elected officials ought to trust them.

Print Article

Read More Editorials

Radical change is correct goal

May 13, 2019 at 10:15 am | Impediments to reforming Beloit schools are no longer acceptable. EVEN THOUGH HIS first day of work as Beloit's superintendent of schools won't be until this summer, Dr. Stanley Munro already is h...

Comments

Read More

The Constitution, not political party

May 13, 2019 at 10:15 am | Constitutional principles apply to both Democrats and Republicans. LET'S SAY THE congressional committee's investigation is about the terrorist attack on the U.S. compound in Benghazi. And let's ...

Comments

Read More

Next up: Illinois style budgeting

May 06, 2019 at 10:58 am | Voters gave Wisconsin divided government. This is what it looks like in the Age of Polarization. AND SO IT BEGINS. Wisconsin citizens should get used to gridlock, possibly even to the extent that ...

Comments

Read More

Can the courts return balance?

April 29, 2019 at 9:53 am | Founders intended to avoid an all-powerful presidency. THERE'S LITTLE DOUBT the simmering struggle between President Trump and House Democrats ultimately will move to the federal courts. That coul...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(608) 365-8811
149 State Street
Beloit, WI 53511

©2019 Beloit Daily News Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X